Today's hottest deals

Allview Allbook I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAllview Allbook I  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201210
Uptime19.8 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 07:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 196
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 310
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.6
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800s 256GB SSD 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 350 339 331 329 331 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 428
Write 328
Mixed 315
SusWrite 338
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 19.7
113% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 32.4
82% 169 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.7
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 72%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Allbook I Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Allview Allbook I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback