Today's hottest deals

EVOO EVC156-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEVOO EVC156-1  (all builds)
MotherboardEVOO EVOO
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 22:37
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 130
46% 81 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 230
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 10.5
7% 9.1 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 9.8
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800s 256GB SSD 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 86 89 42 64 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41% Average
Read 338
Write 289
Mixed 210
SusWrite 94.5
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 14.4
46% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 71.6
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 22.5
59% 117 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 81%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
16GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 8.2 7.2 6 7.6 8.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 97.7
Write 3.7
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 7
24% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 46.6
MC Mixed 19.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EVC156-1 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: EVOO EVC156-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback