Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 08:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 439
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD(1002 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 50.9
32% 41.4 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 23.3
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 93 92 77 93 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 256
Write 140
Mixed 187
SusWrite 86.2
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 31.2
100% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 121
93% 125 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GLLTU160N02 SP008GLLTU160N02 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback