Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510QA
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 01:42
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 43.6
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 65.5
28% 45.9 Pts
4-Core 46.9
8-Core 107
9% 76.9 Pts
64-Core 76.1
5% 76.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 1931) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 9.5
6% 7.93 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 6.5
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VG 256GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 165 94 80 77 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 175
Mixed 208
SusWrite 98.8
137% 183 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 5.6
972% 6 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback