Gigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 03:28
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 457
52% 405 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 83.8
45% 65.2 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 42.7
42% 53.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 49 56 55 43 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 51.8
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 50.7
35% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 55%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
376GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 97 98 96 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 110
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 97.3
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 99U5403-036.A00G Samsung 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback