Gigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 09:56
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 197
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 528
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 75.1
43% 53.9 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 42.8
42% 53.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 459 371 394 430 428 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 414
Mixed 331
SusWrite 413
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 32.4
125% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 175
162% 244 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 102%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
230GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 103
Mixed 51
SusWrite 97.4
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
126GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 58.8
Write 51.7
Mixed 40.7
38% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 99U5403-036.A00G Samsung 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback