Today's hottest deals

Lenovo M70EZE20

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo M70EZE20  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 313A
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 06:20
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 712
76% 603 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W4100
AMD(1002 2B1E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 11.1
6% 10.1 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 218 218 219 219 219 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,427
Write 908
Mixed 959
SusWrite 252
197% 886 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 59.2
226% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 565
490% 716 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 177%
Great: 199%
King SHARE SSD 120GB
105GB free
Firmware: V2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 82 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62% Good
Read 466
Write 364
Mixed 322
SusWrite 105
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 13.8
106% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 21.9
52% 106 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CVF 0443 RMUA5110MD78HAF-2666 12GB
2933, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 15
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback