Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110 23,169 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 189 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 502 52% 419 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 58 36 35 22 29 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 325 Mixed 302 SusWrite 70.5 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 57.8 172% 54 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 326 256% 354 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 114%
Seagate ST1000VX001-1HH162 1TB 3,381 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 680GB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 149 150 149 148 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 144 Write 146 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 149 91% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 240GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 196 193 193 195 188 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 70.1 Mixed 84.1 SusWrite 193 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-16 4x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 32.9 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 1,091 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GBKingstonBench 80%, 411 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 67%, 1,867 samples	5x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $920