Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	4.89% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Wincor B/iPOS+ Advanced Cel-G1820TE,4GB,PCT,HDD (all builds)
Motherboard	WINCOR D611H81
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '21 at 14:15
Run Duration	1138 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1820TE 25 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 57.7 1-Core 33.7 2-Core 84.5 36% 58.6 Pts	4-Core 97.8 8-Core 95.2 13% 96.5 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 30 34 30 33 24 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	4.89% Terrible	Read 25 Write 43.2 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 31.5 7% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3 6% 2 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 128%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.9 7.2 7.2 6.9 7 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	4.72% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 7 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 7 12% 9.43 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.72% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 0112 76.B353G.C0J0C 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.8% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 14.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.1 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM