Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration454 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 144
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 415
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 933 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 52.8
33% 42.5 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 23.7
25% 31.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
640GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 346 370 377 355 379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 424
Write 335
Mixed 366
SusWrite 364
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 36.3
105% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 5
62% 144 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
571GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 105 104 100 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 95
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 103
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 168 176 177 167 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 104%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
3TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 38 35 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 35.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 36.9
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 75 74 72 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 74.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 73.6
90% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
48% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
536GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 37
Write 33.3
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 18.9
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 59%
WD easystore 2624 5TB
355GB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 28 29 29 28 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 49.3
Write 82
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 38.1
77% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 65%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 33.8
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 19.1
40% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback