Today's hottest deals

Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 15:24
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 154
57% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 343
39% 305 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.2% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 130
Parallax 136
99% 129 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 127
Splatting 110
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 115 103 116 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 500
Write 118
Mixed 230
SusWrite 112
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 83.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 9.2
141% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 550GB
246GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade YN1J8O05X3T5EC-468 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback