Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GE63 Raider RGB 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16P5  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 19:13
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 364
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 83.8
Parallax 16.5
65% 60.1 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 43.3
21% 23.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 82%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1214) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 1
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 351 351 359 364 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 416
Write 339
Mixed 303
SusWrite 353
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 28.6
98% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 147
127% 196 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 133%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
219GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.4% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 37.1
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 21.3
7% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 11.5
40% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 22.4
DQ Mixed 26.1
19% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 77%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
173GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 106 110 109 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 131
Write 118
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 108
69% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 75%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB
901GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 32.2
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 21.1
22% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
233% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 105%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
118GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 58.1
Write 57.9
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 57.5
72% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 64GB
25GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 10 11 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
9.22% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 7
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 10.9
16% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.8
148% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.22%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback