Asrock P67 Professional

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Professional (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120508
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '21 at 15:02
Run Duration	325 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 87 2-Core 170 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 303 43% 316 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 83A0) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 0.8 2% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 285 281 285 282 251 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 357 Write 419 Mixed 242 SusWrite 277 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 30.4 109% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 319 243% 328 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 106%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 65GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 127 128 105 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 164 Write 119 Mixed 134 SusWrite 121 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 21.5 78% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 96.6 DQ Mixed 128 98% 137 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 66%
Pcie SSD 1TB 40,637 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 472GB free Firmware: T0828A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1074 1122 1121 1113 1070 995 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,219 Write 1,035 Mixed 796 SusWrite 1,083 232% 1,033 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 24.4 141% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 890 DQ Write 596 DQ Mixed 518 447% 668 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 284%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 228GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 267 265 267 266 246 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 450 Mixed 432 SusWrite 262 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 41 131% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 360 272% 366 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 166 163 168 167 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 156 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 164 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 120 119 120 119 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 69 Write 37.4 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 118 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 72%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 894GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 101 99 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 106 Write 106 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 99.3 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 76%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 4GB 1,195 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7 7.1 7 7 6.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Read 19 Write 6.7 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 6.9 10% 9.33 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 M378B5173QH0-CK0 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.5 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Professional Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Professional

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	39x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	25x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 480GBIntensoBench 73%, 279 samples	6x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	6x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	5x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 M378B5173QH0-CK0 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GBSamsungBench 58%, 5 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $451

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16