Asrock Z490 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z490 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 23:20
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 296
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 1,121
99% 838 Pts
64-Core 1,958
121% 1,958 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
178% Outstanding
Lighting 252
Reflection 256
Parallax 261
205% 256 fps
MRender 305
Gravity 209
Splatting 171
180% 228 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 178%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 311 311 309 310 310 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,381
Write 1,462
Mixed 1229
SusWrite 363
300% 1,359 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 73.9
250% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 945
692% 908 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 235%
Great: 280%
PNY CS900 120GB SSD
36GB free
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 134 91 90 91 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 491
Write 448
Mixed 373
SusWrite 148
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 34.7
139% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 197
176% 264 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
47GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 152 154 153 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 153
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 190 190 192 191 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 170
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 190
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C15-8GTZR 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 28.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 28.1
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z490 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback