Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160225
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '22 at 13:30
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3260 9,453 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 178 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 181 23% 175 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 0402) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4280 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 3.1 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Gigabyte(1458 351A) 1GB CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	9.52% Terrible	Lighting 10.9 Reflection 15.6 Parallax 11 9% 12.5 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 12.3 Splatting 11.5 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.52% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 243 259 258 251 258 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 441 Write 377 Mixed 363 SusWrite 265 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 98.1 4K Mixed 55.3 156% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 304 233% 317 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 147GB free Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 90 92 94 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 95 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 91.6 63% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 64GB free Firmware: 3B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 53 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 54.5 Write 51.7 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 54.3 38% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 70GB free Firmware: 1H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 71 74 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 91.8 Write 80.8 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 72.9 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 69%
WDC WD16 00HLFS-75G6U1 160GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 23GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 34 33 33 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.8% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 36.8 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 32.9 48% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 23%
Wilk USB DISK 2.0 16GB 302 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 3.6 2 1.6 1.8 1.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Read 14.3 Write 2 Mixed 9 SusWrite 1.8 8% 6.77 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 10%
WD 318AS External 250GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 123GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.38% Terrible	Read 1 Write 0.8 Mixed 1 SusWrite 1.1 1% 0.98 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.38% Great: 2%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLHG45F-D8KMBA 1x8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-VG4 R3.0 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	119x
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	34x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	33x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	40x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 52%, 50 samples	15x
99U5584-005.A00LF 0467 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GBKingstonBench 58%, 49 samples	14x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $362

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353