Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R3.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 14:46
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 84.9
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 185
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 184
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0402) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4280
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 351A) 1GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 11.2
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 11.6
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 264 265 258 257 258 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 377
Mixed 340
SusWrite 279
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 60.5
200% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 31.9
81% 166 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
147GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 87 92 93 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 86
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 90.5
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
65GB free
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 67.8
Write 67
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 3
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
67GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 72 71 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 79.8
Write 75.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 71.1
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 69%
WD 318AS External 250GB
123GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.71% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.8
Mixed 1
SusWrite 1.1
1% 0.98 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
32% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLHG45F-D8KMBA Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R3.0 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback