American 5.11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAmerican 5.11  (all builds)
MotherboardQIYIDA X99-H9
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 20:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 168
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 668
59% 502 Pts
64-Core 1,420
88% 1,420 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
MSI(1462 1270) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1.9
4% 4.13 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 4
Splatting 3.9
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R025C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 422 422 420 424 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 417
Mixed 361
SusWrite 423
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 31
126% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 177
151% 215 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Verbatim STORE N GO 2GB
2GB free, PID 3623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.6 7.3 7.3 7.1 7.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 6.8
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-023.A00LF 99U5471-023.A00LF KRE-D3U1600M/4G KRE-D3U1600M/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 32.2
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5.11 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: American 5.11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback