American 5.11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAmerican 5.11  (all builds)
MotherboardQIYIDA X99-H9
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 19:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 178
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 711
62% 531 Pts
64-Core 1,418
88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 22.9
19% 22.1 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 18.7
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R025C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 428 426 430 425 422 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 423
Mixed 364
SusWrite 428
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 33.2
126% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 175
151% 214 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
Netac 256GB 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: ZD0R025C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 431 427 428 425 425 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 423
Mixed 368
SusWrite 429
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 32.6
128% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 179
152% 214 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-023.A00LF 99U5471-023.A00LF KRE-D3U1600M/4G KRE-D3U1600M/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 31.5
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5.11 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: American 5.11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback