bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 13:54
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 66
34% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 225
33% 241 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 472GB
369GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 68 73 104 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 384
Write 199
Mixed 312
SusWrite 94.1
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 11.2
42% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 135
100% 133 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 91%
Vmware Virtual disk 11GB
9GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 33 30 31 38 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 87%
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 40 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 32GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 33 30 31 38 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 45.7
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback