Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 836B
Memory	6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170602
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '22 at 17:58
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	UGA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22% Poor	Memory 28.1 1-Core 22.8 2-Core 44.5 20% 31.8 Pts	4-Core 86.5 8-Core 128 13% 107 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 836B) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.57% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 8.3 Parallax 9.2 6% 8.33 fps	MRender 14.2 Gravity 8.4 Splatting 6.2 7% 9.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 6.57% Great: 25%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 836B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 8.4 Parallax 2.5 2% 4.37 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.6 3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 275 272 271 267 265 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 1,052 Write 936 Mixed 824 SusWrite 299 174% 778 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 39.6 126% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 159% 225 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 236%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100V 1TB 2,427 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 218GB free Firmware: AX001Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 94 92 96 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 94.3 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 93.8 59% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.2 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 266 15% 266 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,410x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	985x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	49x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	212x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	104x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	91x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	241x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	212x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	149x

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $33

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16