Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G9-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2_SKS
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161128
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 21:09
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 172
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 477
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 476
29% 476 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.6% Very good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 114
Parallax 88.3
69% 95.9 fps
MRender 90.2
Gravity 88.6
Splatting 98.6
76% 92.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 199 184 173 199 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 536
Write 334
Mixed 295
SusWrite 178
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 12.3
64% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 91.4
80% 120 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 237%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
163GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 88 91 89 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 83.5
Write 76.9
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 88.6
48% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback