Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Casper EXCALIBUR G770 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER NLAI 001
Memory	5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200914
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '22 at 04:24
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 56 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 151 55% 97 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 462 41% 348 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Quanta(152D 1244) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	5.05% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 48.3 Parallax 5 5% 19.7 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 9.5 6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.05% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GB 941 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.5% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.9 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 7 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	738x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	454x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	351x

SSD
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	646x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	376x
SSD 500GBKioxia-exceriaBench 175%, 10,941 samples	323x

RAM
CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GBCrucialBench 44%, 1,443 samples	469x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	255x
CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GBCrucialBench 45%, 941 samples	197x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16