Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H270M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 04:54
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 226
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 680
70% 562 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 31.7
28% 37.3 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 28.2
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 480G 480GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 427 434 428 418 423 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 414
Write 367
Mixed 337
SusWrite 414
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 21.7
119% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 36.4
76% 153 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
927GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 137 134 145 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 139
Write 136
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 140
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
133GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 121 121 126 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 123
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38.9
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 41.6
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UHC 029E CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback