Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 11:26
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 181
75% 125 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 390
44% 348 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.7% Below average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 67
Parallax 38.9
39% 51.4 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 47
38% 45.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 519 402 641 563 301 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 879
Write 755
Mixed 755
SusWrite 426
158% 704 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 46.3
164% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 586
444% 600 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 139%
Great: 130%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
770GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 144
Write 141
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 128
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
233% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB
8GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.3 3.8 6.9 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 7.4
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.8
12% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8RT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 24.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback