MSI MS-17C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GP73 Leopard 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-17C5  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 10:08
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 701
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1215) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 120
Parallax 7.9
5% 44.8 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 199 163 85 77 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 430
Write 270
Mixed 277
SusWrite 137
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 19.6
95% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 292
229% 319 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 130%
Intel Optane+931GBHDD 1TB
58GB free
Firmware: 15.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 146 158 165 151 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 11.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 14.7
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17C5 Builds (Compare 1,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback