Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 21:18
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 186
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 444
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 450
Nvidia(10DE 0619) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.00
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.4
1% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Nvidia NVS 300
Nvidia(10DE 0862) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 241 231 240 253 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60% Good
Read 459
Write 300
Mixed 267
SusWrite 250
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 20.7
70% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 54.1
53% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 60%
Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
862GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 37 37 39 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 189
Write 108
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 36.5
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 110%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 130
Write 97.1
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 1
54% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 105%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
131GB free, PID 235c
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 138 125 133 138 147 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 224
Mixed 182
SusWrite 138
246% 178 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 15.6
1,241% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 45.5
DQ Mixed 28.9
2,629% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 221%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 10.3
106% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 57%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 1.8 0.7 1.4 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 167
Write 163
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 3.4
125% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba-0098 KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8GX 9905403-558.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback