Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z170 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 01:18
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 241
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 670
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 36FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.1% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 162
Parallax 105
93% 127 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 138
Splatting 117
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$200
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 460 326 5.1 302 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 399
Write 462
Mixed 372
SusWrite 310
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 40.7
149% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 335
252% 337 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 179 179 180 185 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 182
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 184
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
323% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 175 169 169 169 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 98.1
Write 133
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 168
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
221% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 152 161 165 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 122
Write 113
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 157
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.9
287% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST5000DM003-2FH18L 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 178 181 186 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 74
Write 156
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 180
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
242% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 88%
JMicron Generic DISK02 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 169 172 177 180 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 133
Write 153
Mixed 123
SusWrite 172
203% 145 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 70%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK04 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 44 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 129
Write 147
Mixed 111
SusWrite 43.7
143% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 97%
JMicron Generic DISK01 10TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 44 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 230
Write 217
Mixed 119
SusWrite 43.6
190% 152 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.1
240% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60%
Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK00 10TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 44 45 45 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 202
Write 198
Mixed 106
SusWrite 44.4
174% 138 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 89%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 44 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 92.5
Write 123
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 43.7
98% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
275% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 25.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 OC Formula Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $692
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback