Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 08:43
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 97.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 239
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 600
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 109
Parallax 99.8
85% 104 fps
MRender 90.9
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 96.3
78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
531GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 380 422 448 456 445 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 445
Mixed 411
SusWrite 409
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 47
154% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 306
245% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
101GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 385 425 451 457 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 410
Mixed 389
SusWrite 413
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 48
155% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 297
243% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
948GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 91 91 87 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 76.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 86.4
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 105%
ASMT 2105 1TB
253GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 69 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 62.9
Write 64
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 68.6
86% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 31.9
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 5,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $587
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback