Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10SAE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X10SAE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SAE
Memory11.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 100
2-Core 195
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 358
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 33.2
19% 28.1 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 26.5
25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 399 407 388 417 417 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 476
Write 336
Mixed 384
SusWrite 388
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 23.5
120% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 95.3
112% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 176 180 179 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 179
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 177
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SAE Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X10SAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $360
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback