Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10SAE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X10SAE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SAE
Memory11.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 00:23
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 185
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 374
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 33.2
20% 28.2 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 26.5
25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 386 394 371 365 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 403
Write 284
Mixed 338
SusWrite 362
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 24.7
118% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 96.8
109% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 83%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 177 179 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 157
Mixed 36
SusWrite 175
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SAE Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X10SAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $360
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback