Today's hottest deals

Asus G750JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G750JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JM
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 507
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Asus(1043 157D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 17
Parallax 19.4
17% 19.2 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 15.4
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S210712b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 395 384 385 391 392 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 398
Write 418
Mixed 410
SusWrite 377
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 36.3
130% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 305
223% 290 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 99%
UFD USB Flash Drive 4GB
2GB free, PID a826
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.4
9% 8.33 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JM Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback