Today's hottest deals

HP 255 G4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8137
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 15:42
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6015 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 38.4
1-Core 21.4
2-Core 42.1
22% 34 Pts
4-Core 42.2
8-Core 41.3
6% 41.8 Pts
64-Core 41.2
2% 41.2 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
HP(103C 8137) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.9
1% 2 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.5
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vi550 S3 SSD 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 153 209 235 313 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 396
Write 342
Mixed 295
SusWrite 240
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 16.1
72% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 80.2
DQ Mixed 29.7
39% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
9GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.2 7.1 7.9 8.9 8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 2.8
Mixed 2
SusWrite 7.7
10% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.5
217% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.5
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $29
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback