Today's hottest deals

Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 10:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 181
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 342
44% 334 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.1% Below average
Lighting 48.5
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 53.5
40% 44.6 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 44.5
Splatting 25.9
26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-960-G3 960GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 63 49 24 62 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 445
Write 133
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 41.6
34% 159 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 3.7
48% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 0.7
43% 104 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
1.5TB free
Firmware: ML6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 122 125 124 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 115
Write 123
Mixed 68
SusWrite 123
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5471-020.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback