Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 16:56
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 709
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 144
Parallax 133
107% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
121GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1136 787 760 744 725 698 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,195
Write 1,482
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 808
342% 1,533 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 85.9
290% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,127
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 954
712% 954 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 270%
Great: 410%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,853
Write 1,224
Mixed 502
261% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 46
194% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,066
DQ Write 633
DQ Mixed 762
591% 820 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB
93GB free
Firmware: SBFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 74 66 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 297
Write 239
Mixed 239
SusWrite 99.9
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 30.7
131% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 172
153% 229 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 80%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
385GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 131 130 127 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 43.2
Write 107
Mixed 31
SusWrite 129
56% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.2
391% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C15-8GVRB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C15-8GVRB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $696
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback