Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Memory 25 1-Core 17 2-Core 45 17% 29 Pts	4-Core 62.3 8-Core 78.8 9% 70.6 Pts	64-Core 73.7 5% 73.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 076B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 2.4 1% 2.43 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 480GB 480GB 236 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 398GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 243 217 241 262 262 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.2% Average	Read 252 Write 216 Mixed 245 SusWrite 241 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 7.1 38% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 44.3 58% 106 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 286 14% 286 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD340 128GBTranscend $88Bench 67%, 2,082 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,182 samples	7x
ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 1,256 samples	5x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	4x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16