Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition  (all builds)
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 14:15
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 332
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,150
110% 906 Pts
64-Core 2,156
133% 2,156 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$520
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 200
Parallax 195
182% 206 fps
MRender 221
Gravity 152
Splatting 124
131% 166 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 152%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PR 1TB
438GB free
Firmware: EIFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2221 1014 742 960 682 681 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDS200T1X0E-00AF 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2611 605 573 602 546 706 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST10000NE0004-1ZF101 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 207 209 210 210 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 131%
Seagate ST12000NM0007-2A1101 12TB
5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 121 122 122 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 135%
Seagate ST12000NM0007-2A1101 12TB
8TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 209 210 211 212 212 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$172
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 171 171 174 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 116%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$289
2TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 198 205 196 200 201 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 148
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 199
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB
17TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 264 263 266 268 268 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 33%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.4 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 30.1
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 8.1
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
256% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 89%
WD My Book 25EE 14TB
8TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 36.3
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 20.7
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.6
218% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 103%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 20TB
4TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 36.8
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 21.2
43% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 39.8
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 41.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 116%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Razer Edition Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback