Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8257
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 09:17
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 177
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 295
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
HP(103C 8257) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1215
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.9
6% 6.8 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 5.7
6% 7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ortial SSD 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0914A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 980 189 198 304 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,652
Write 822
Mixed 753
SusWrite 477
205% 926 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 18.8
166% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 314
286% 425 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 164%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16S4B.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback