Gigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z170XP-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 19:59
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 199
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 683
65% 537 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
MSI(1462 3861) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 111
Parallax 125
106% 122 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 119
Splatting 96.4
93% 116 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 143 131 82 45 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 446
Write 336
Mixed 311
SusWrite 80.7
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 31.4
138% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 9.3
62% 146 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 87%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 24TB
16TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 64 183 163 124 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
Read 46
Write 79.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 135
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
399GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 119 120 119 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 86.1
Write 102
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 118
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
170% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 155 157 149 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 80.1
Write 116
Mixed 68
SusWrite 149
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 90%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
99GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 96 95 95 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 96.9
Mixed 65
SusWrite 94.3
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.1
301% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 029E CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170XP-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $614
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback