Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-179C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE72MVR 7RG
MotherboardMSI MS-179C  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 15:51
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 559
55% 449 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11DE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 126
Parallax 7.5
6% 46.8 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-00000 512GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 387 431 413 399 432 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 466
Mixed 373
SusWrite 407
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.2
206% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
726GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 129 134 136 129 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 119
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 130
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-179C Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-179C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback