Hp-pavilion KZ676AA-ABZ m9295.it

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion KZ676AA-ABZ m9295.it  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 00:35
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 79.9
39% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 158
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 44.2
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 41.7
36% 44.1 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 36.8
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 215 215 160 137 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.5% Good
Read 254
Write 241
Mixed 239
SusWrite 173
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 38.2
123% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 187
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 137%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
940GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 140 140 113 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 82
Mixed 64
SusWrite 121
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 42%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 27.8
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 24.1
37% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KZ676AA-ABZ m9295.it Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KZ676AA-ABZ m9295.it

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback