Gigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170XP-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161104
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 04 '17 at 18:18
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 876
95% 751 Pts
64-Core 883
55% 883 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.4% Average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 43.8
38% 48.2 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 60.8
48% 58 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc300 NVMe SK hynix 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 20005A00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,664
Write 950
Mixed 1,339
292% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 15.8
70% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 573
DQ Mixed 13.8
167% 394 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 171%
Great: 199%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
843GB free
Firmware: CXY74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,752
Write 1,237
Mixed 1,358
322% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 33.7
106% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 237
186% 243 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 190%
Great: 294%
Thnsn51t02du7 NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,732
Write 1,272
Mixed 1,228
313% 1,411 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 19.7
84% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 17.8
147% 345 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 195%
Great: 247%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
447GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 483
Write 340
Mixed 340
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 8.77
53% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 39.9
95% 203 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 157
Mixed 159
126% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.22
79% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FARG 8313 CL16-16-16 D4-2400 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FARG 8313 CL16-16-16 D4-2400 32GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170XP-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback