Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory50.4 GB free of 56 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 18:58
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 754
72% 596 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 97.8
Reflection 122
Parallax 116
80% 112 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 93.7
Splatting 99.5
87% 107 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 344GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 485 481 488 471 483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 482
Mixed 489
SusWrite 483
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 40.5
130% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 130
98% 130 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 96%
Great: 96%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 34GB
28GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 494
Mixed 477
109% 489 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 41.2
132% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 131
97% 129 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 32GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 55.2
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 65.4
152% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 30.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 134%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback