bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 12:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Memory 39.2
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 48.6
30% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 46.6
8-Core 51
6% 48.8 Pts
64-Core 47.7
3% 47.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 34.5
34% 39.9 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 36.8
21% 23.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 344GB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 272 329 407 82 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42% Average
Read 290
Write 433
Mixed 336
SusWrite 259
75% 330 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 8.3
27% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 164
117% 149 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 16GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 13312 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 9 64 0" 1280 720 MSH062E HyperVMonitor
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback