bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 15:46
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 156
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 354
45% 340 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 35.6
Parallax 31.2
27% 33.1 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 32
Splatting 35
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 43GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.8
Write 142
Mixed 35.4
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
3072, 5120 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 45
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 16.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 108%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 64 0" 1920 1017 MSH062E HyperVMonitor
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback