Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWHA
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111004
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '17 at 12:25
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 91.6 1-Core 30.3 2-Core 43.9 42% 55.3 Pts	4-Core 90.9 8-Core 90.5 12% 90.7 Pts	64-Core 92.9 6% 92.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M 3,213 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FC90) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 314.22 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 4.29 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 1.74 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Triactor 480GB-$150 1,840 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1126A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 787 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1171 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 136 (A3) Unknown 100 100 31 (A4) Unknown 100 100 24219 (A5) Unknown 100 100 82 (A6) Unknown 100 100 5 (A7) Unknown 100 100 18 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 22 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 31 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 315812 (F2) Unknown 100 100 457833 (F5) Unknown 100 100 193752	54.1% Above average	Read 470 Write 253 Mixed 243 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 16.1 52% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 51.8 DQ Mixed 28.1 35% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 99%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 176GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 176 176 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2403 (05) Reallocated sector count 56 56 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 7994 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2254 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 76 76 245302 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 244813463589 (C4) Reallocation count 49 49 1366 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	49.7% Average	Read 92.6 Write 80.8 Mixed 22.1 47% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.18 64% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 209GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 23.7 Mixed 25.2 33% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.15 46% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8394 991647 (996647) 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.3% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 4.9 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	120x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	75x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	174x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	168x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	53x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	43x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16