Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Huananzhi X99-TF

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Huananzhi X99-TF (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory	57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210511
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '22 at 10:09
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$95 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 78 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 195 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 640 62% 512 Pts	64-Core 785 49% 785 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.6% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 38 Parallax 43 28% 38.6 fps	MRender 31.6 Gravity 31.5 Splatting 24.3 23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$59 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 121 130 136 143 143 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.3% Above average	Read 280 Write 170 Mixed 238 SusWrite 136 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 27.9 90% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 142 115% 160 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 84%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 157GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 135 133 130 133 132 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 166 Write 194 Mixed 165 SusWrite 130 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 28 101% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 154 127% 182 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 66%
Seagate ST1000DL004 HD10 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 681GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 60 60 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 25.3 Write 31.2 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 60.7 29% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 59%
Seagate ST1000DL004 HD10 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 467GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 89 90 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 21.3 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 90.4 49% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1TB free Firmware: AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 68 67 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 77.6 Write 80.4 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 66.9 54% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 516GB free Firmware: AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 72 74 74 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 77 Write 77.3 Mixed 49.6 SusWrite 73.5 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 68%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$75 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 419GB free Firmware: 0K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 78 90 90 91 90 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 86.6 Write 84.5 Mixed 65.2 SusWrite 88 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 396GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 84 85 86 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 78.1 Write 86.1 Mixed 78 SusWrite 83.8 61% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 4x16GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 28.4 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 20.3 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 84.3 47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-TF Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Huananzhi X99-TF

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	207x
Xeon E5-2673 v3IntelBench 70%, 592 samples	17x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
RTX 3060Nvidia $256Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	19x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	15x

SSD
SA2000M8250G 250GBKingstonBench 171%, 42,173 samples	9x
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	6x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	6x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	12x
Atermiter 4x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 483 samples	8x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350