Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EE
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200626
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 10:24
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 147
46% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 213
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 81EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.27 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 197 189 189 189 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 348
Write 162
Mixed 259
SusWrite 186
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 24.8
83% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 236
174% 230 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
263GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 40 40 41 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 38.7
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 38.9
27% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 1.4
2% 1.33 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.M8FA 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback