Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A7 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V12.1
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 00:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 257
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 710
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 7.2
5% 22.3 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 203 154 153 155 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,460
Write 922
Mixed 960
SusWrite 182
195% 881 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 68.8
239% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 677
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 576
479% 683 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 176%
Great: 199%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
863GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 118 120 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 119
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GS2400.C8D Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V12.1 Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback