Today's hottest deals

Asus GD30CI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAsus GD30CI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GD30CI
Memory16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170413
Uptime22.9 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 00:29
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 177
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 307
37% 284 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 8725) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 123
Parallax 111
90% 115 fps
MRender 90.8
Gravity 112
Splatting 100
83% 101 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 279
Mixed 237
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 22
79% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 218
154% 198 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
51GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 95 132 108 134 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 86.2
Write 102
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 127
59% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
4GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.6 6.8 6.2 6.8 6.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 28.4
Write 4
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 6.5
10% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 20.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 10.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GD30CI Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Asus GD30CI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback