Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory7.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 02:21
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 40.5
1-Core 47
2-Core 189
46% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 377
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 183GB
139GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 68%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
91GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 111GB
39GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 103GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 75%
Vmware Virtual disk 38GB
11GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 58% Great: 64%
Vmware Virtual disk 156GB
10GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 114GB
8GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 79GB
25GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 44% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 28GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 43.9
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 9.6
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback